I consider myself an environmentalist of sorts. I believe it is important that we properly take care of the earth that God has given to us and I find it upsetting when people take it for granted. And while I'm skeptical that the world is on the fast-track to becoming inhospitable within the next century because of global warming, I do think that our behavior affects the planet and that we ought to be much more active about our "green" efforts.
However, I've noticed a disturbing trend among environmentalists that I think Christians ought to be careful of: the idea that mankind is the enemy.
This theme often emerges in pop culture. Take the remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still where Keanu Reeves' character states, "If the earth dies, you die. If you die, the earth survives." In other words, you can't live without the earth, but, in fact, the earth needs to get rid of you if it has any chance at survival!
You can also find this belief among the scientific community. Take this quote from biologist Edward O. Wilson:
"If all mankind were to disappear, the world would regenerate back to the rich state of equilibrium that existed ten thousand years ago. If insects were to vanish, the environment would collapse into chaos."
The obvious implication here is that human beings are bad for the earth - that human beings are in fact the worst thing that has ever happened to this planet. Additionally, Wilson makes the assertion that insects are more important, in a sense better, than humans.
But consider, on the other hand, Genesis chapter 1. This is the account of God's creation of the universe, and more specifically, the earth. With each passing day of creation (except, for some reason, the second) God looks at what he's made and declares it to be good.
On the sixth day, however, the last thing that God creates is humanity - the highest order of his creation. And it is not until humanity is present that God looks at his creation and says that it is very good.
While humanity did have a tremendously negative impact on creation by introducing it to sin (AKA: the fall), the answer to this problem is not to get rid of humanity. In fact, God decided against that route when he saved Noah and his family from the flood. Instead, God's plan is to ultimately restore humanity, and all of creation, to his original design through the death and resurrection of his Son, Jesus Christ.
So when the world, be it academia or pop culture, tells us that humanity is ultimately evil and bad for the earth, remember that this was not how God created us to be. Instead, God created us as the finishing touch on his once perfect creation and gave us the responsibility to take care of what he made. Although we have failed at our job, that does not mean he has given up on us - it just means we need a little more of his help.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
God did say that what he created on the fifth day was good. (Genesis 1:21)
Whoops, I meant the second day. Thanks for the correction.
in a way, wilson is right. if we continue to live out of sync with the way God intended us to live, then we will continue to destroy the earth and it's non-human inhabitants are better off without us.
humans and creation are locked in a symbotic relationship. we are dependent on creation to live and creation is dependent upon us living out our mandate to care for it.
i think that the anger environmentalists like wilson display towards our treatment of creation is quite warranted and probably shared by God.
but you are also right. we musn't elevate creation above humanity or descend into self-loathing, believing that we're the enemy. we must, however, recognize that we live in an incredibly delicate ecological balance and that our actions DO matter and we can destroy this place. and we must develope a reverence and respect for all of creation realizing it is a gift and a blessing.
"we live in an incredibly delicate ecological balance"
Wow... what a low view of God's creation...
Chris,
I see your point - but it's not the conclusion that we can harm the planet that I'm at odds with. My problem is taking that conclusion to the extreme that humans are bad for the planet.
God gave us the job of having dominion over creation. I think a lot of Christians have taken that to mean dominating the planet/lording over it/etc... However, I take it to mean that we are responsible for taking care of the planet and being good stewards of it.
When we fail at our job, yes, we could destroy this place. But when we succeed at our job, then this place can be far better than it ever could without us.
Just look at how we can cultivate a garden to make wild growth even more beautiful. And then we can care for the plants in that garden and make them grow more healthy and productive than they would in the wild. This is just a tiny example of what good we can offer creation.
Heath,
I don't know that it's a low view of creation to say that it's a delicate balance. God did give us the responsibility to care for creation. If it was so resilient then would it have needed a caretaker? Or am I taking your comment the wrong way?
steve- i agree.
heath- why?
Post a Comment